NON-PROFIT  Non-Compliance:

1.  Non-compliance with CORPORATION CODE SECTION 6321 (i) (ii) (iii)
     a) Failed to comply with Section 6321 (ii) on two occasions for requests for
         in-person and hard copies of the non-profit applications, returns and financial information.
         1)  Request for In-person  (See: 
http://www.ilena-rosenthal.com/request.html)
         2) A Delivery Confirmation mailed request, including cash payment
              (See: http://www.ilena-rosenthal.com/request2.html
               b)  Doubtful that financial records are kept accurate or records audited timely.
     c)  Fails to comply with Section 6321 (i) on its public website where it solicits for donations.
     d)  Doubtful that Section 6321 (iii) has ever been complied with.
2.  Refusal to identify ‘agent’ for personal service.
     a)  Director lists mail drop service as residence for personal service.
     b)  Director listed as ‘agent for service’, but is in/out of living in Costa Rica.
     c)  No ‘hand delivery’ possible
3.  Questionable operation
     a)  No by-laws
     b)  The Board of Directors are required to meet each quarter
          of the Fiscal Year, in addition to one annual meeting the
          last month of the Fiscal Year.
          1.  Doubtful these ‘meetings’ have been documented with Minutes.
    c)  Minutes of Meetings are also required for the dispensation of funds,
          other than normal day to day operating funds. 
          1.  Doubtful Minutes reflect any approvals.
     d)  Quarterly or annual meetings doubtful
4.  Foundation telephone and computer used for personal use?
     a)  It Director represents the foundation 365 24/7 then all
          business done over the phone line and computer must
          be for official non-profit use.
         
http://www.irs.gov/charities/charitable/article/0,,id=123368,00.html
     b)  Note the Directors own words: ”The facts are that we can live for a fraction of
          what living in San Diego costs ... small amounts of money go far more
          slowly ... and I can run my foundation from my computer ... wherever it is.”
          Director voices her 'control'.
5.  Excess amounts allotted to Director for fees and rent of computer space in tiny apartment
     a)  Rent from 44 to 80% of total income
     b)  Salary added to rental amount of Directors apt
          1) Combined, has been 49.8% to 91.5% of Gross income
6.  No Form 990 was filed with IRS for Fiscal year 2001
     a)  Copy of Form 990 obtained from California only
     b)  Gross amount was $29,882
          1)  Mandatory IRS filing requirement for gross amounts over $25,000
7.  Scattered purposes 
      a)  Primary focus advertised as ‘education, health issues’ regarding breast implants
           1)  The Humantics Foundation’s website lists breast implants as it’s primary focus
           2)  The foundation’s available Form 990’s purpose outlines breast implant activities
      b)  Substantial focus also placed on public relations campaigns, First Amendment
           Rights and medical freedom which does not further education regarding
           health issues surrounding breast implants.
           1) Public relations campaigns, First Amendment Rights and medical freedom appear to be
               private interests of the Director.
           2) A substantial amount of the foundation’s website are pages on these subjects, or about
               people ‘suspected’ of being involved in any way with these subjects.
           3) Director of Humantics Foundation was personally sued for defamation
               of "Quackbusters” (
http://www.strausplace.com/article.php?sid=724)
             4) Quackbusters monitor ‘snake oil’ types of alternative medicine treatments.
             5) "They are a dominant threat to alternative and complementary medical practices and
                  practitioners," Rosenthal said. "Their campaigns obstruct health freedom and attempt
                  to chill the voices of their critics and opponents."
      c)  Purposes altered at will of Director
           1)  Doubtful any other board members have input into the operation of this
                foundation, meetings, voting, etc.
           2) Altered purposes are not reflected in articles of incorporation amendments.